11 (Nov 2005)
A Minimally Invasive Approach to the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: The Mini-Maze
- Thu, 5/1/08 - 4:22pm
- 0 Comments
- 4785 reads
Many approaches to AF ablation have been proposed over the past 5-10 years. Some of these are catheter-based, and some require surgery. Catheter ablation approaches have included pulmonary vein isolation and creation of linear lesions. Most prominent among the surgical approaches has been the open-chest approach of the Cox-Maze procedure.
Stroke from clots that form predominantly in the left atrial appendage (LAA) during AF has been one of the most feared outcomes of atrial fibrillation. Approaches to management of this problem have included anticoagulation and development of devices to block or amputate the LAA.
The focus of this article will be a discussion of a new minimally invasive operative procedure for AF that approaches treatment from three different angles. The procedure and equipment used will be discussed in depth, followed by a case report of a patient who underwent the Mini-Maze procedure.
Equipment Used in the Mini-Maze
Utility of Cooled Tip Radiofrequency (RF) Ablation for Accessory Pathways Refractory to Standard RF
- Thu, 5/1/08 - 4:22pm
- 0 Comments
- 1820 reads
Background
The patient is a 17-year-old male diagnosed with ventricular preexcitation since the age of 9. Initially he complained of only intermittent palpitations, but more recently demonstrated an adenosine-sensitive sustained supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Although he was well-controlled on beta-blocker therapy, he was a competitive swimmer and preferred nonpharmacologic curative therapy.
He underwent diagnostic electrophysiology testing eight months prior to the curative ablation. This evaluation diagnosed a manifest posteroseptal pathway (Figure 1) and a concealed right free wall pathway. Unfortunately, ablation attempts were unsuccessful. Repeat procedure six months later was also unsuccessful, despite the use of a unidirectional cooled tipped catheter.
Eight months after the initial procedure, he presented for repeat electrophysiology testing and ablation at our institution.
Electrophysiology Study
Spotlight Interview: King's Daughters Medical Center
- Thu, 5/1/08 - 4:22pm
- 0 Comments
- 2071 reads
What is the size of your EP lab facility and number of staff members? What is the mix of credentials at your lab?
We have five cardiac catheterization labs, one of which functions as an electrophysiology lab. Our lab is staffed with registered nurses, radiology techs, and emergency medical technicians. Out of a staff of 36 people, five are core electrophysiology personnel.
When was the EP lab started at your institution?
Our EP program started in the spring of 1999.
What types of procedures are performed at your facility?
We currently perform EP studies and ablations for AVNRT, AVRT, atrial tachycardia, atrial flutter, ventricular arrhythmias, PVC ablations, and pulmonary vein isolations. We implant pacemakers, ICDs, and biventricular devices. Our EP lab also functions as a cardiac catheterization lab when no EP cases are scheduled.
Approximately how many are performed each week? What complications do you find during these procedures?
Handling ICD and Pacemaker Recalls in Your Clinic
- Thu, 5/1/08 - 4:22pm
- 0 Comments
- 1741 reads
Summary of Recent Advisories
Medtronic, Inc. (Minneapolis, MN) issued a physician advisory letter in February 2005 regarding an increased risk of sudden battery failure in some of its ICDs in the Marquis family. This involved a shorting mechanism attributed to a specific battery design. Some devices were explanted, but the majority was followed closely. The initial response of the medical community was to exchange these devices; however, more patients were likely harmed by the explantation approach than helped by it. In our practice, two patients were referred from other centers for device infection after generator exchanges, for ICD and lead removal. A follow-up analysis showed an anode grid short rate of 0.01-0.07% during the first half of battery life.
Troubleshooter's Casebook:The Shocking Truth About Who Needs an ICD
- Thu, 5/1/08 - 4:22pm
- 0 Comments
- 3109 reads
Not so very long ago, it was probably easier to win the lottery than qualify to get an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). ICDs were considered extreme measures for the most desperate cases. As such, patients had to have survived not one but two documented episodes of sudden cardiac arrest, be drug refractory, but also be strong enough to be able to undergo a thoracotomy to implant the device. Somehow, some patients qualified and received devices!
However, the life-saving potential of ICDs was apparent to many physicians. The ICD world changed when a few committed physicians got together to develop a suite of clinical studies that would explore the implantation of this radical device into arrhythmia-rich populations. The most famous of these studies turned out to be the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) and MADIT II.
New Dimensions in Clinical Risk Management Strategies
- Thu, 5/1/08 - 4:22pm
- 0 Comments
- 1272 reads
To understand where risk management is going, we need to appreciate its past. Historically, risk identification/ management was instituted in the corporate world in the 1940 s as a quality control technique. In the 1970 s, the nation faced a medical malpractice crisis, with a dramatic rise in the number of malpractice claims being filed and given staggering jury awards. The large awards affected professional liability insurance markets. Faced with potential bankruptcy, insurers either withdrew from the market or demanded heightened accountability in reporting and managing risks from insureds. Healthcare providers responded by creating coverage options and initiating programs to identify and control professional liability risks. Risk management efforts focused on retrospective reviews of incidents, loss reduction, and claims management.
Email Discussion Group: November 2005
- Thu, 5/1/08 - 4:22pm
- 0 Comments
- 1178 reads
New Questions:
Licensed Personnel
Double-checking Certain Medications During Procedures
I work in a university-based hospital electrophysiology lab. We have a policy that requires 2 licensed persons to check certain medications prior to administration (e.g., heparin, insulin, chemotherapeutics, etc.) The policy arbitrarily states that these licensed practitioners may be a RN, MD, or resp. therapist. We would like to add the rad tech [RT(R)] as well. Frequently, during a late case, there may only be 1 RN, 1 MD, 1 rad tech and 1 CVT in the procedure room, and the MD would





