St. Jude Medical.
CLINICAL EVENTS CALENDAR
- Tuesday, March 9, 2010 - 23:002010 ACCA Cardiovascular Administrators’ Leadership Conferencehttp://www.aameda.org
- Thursday, March 11, 2010 - 23:0010th Annual Spring Meeting on Cardiovascular Nursinghttp://www.escardio.org/congresses/cardio-nursing-2010/Pages/welcome.aspx
- Saturday, March 13, 2010 - 23:00ACC.10 and i2 Summit 2010http://www.acc.org
- Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - 23:00SCAI 33rd Annual Scientific Sessionshttp://www.scai.org
Universal Protocol
The 2009 JC standards include more specific language on Universal Protocol and site marking for percutaneous procedures. Are there any EP labs that have adopted site marking as a pre-procedure standard for ablation and device implants?
— Lee Anne Hockey, RCIS, RCES
All Subscriptions are FREE to qualified cardiology professionals

- Subscribe to:
- Journal
- Digital Journal
- E-News
- RSS feed
Newly Revised and Updated for 2009!
EP Lab Digest Blogs
- Perspectives in EPTodd J. Cohen, MD
- Pediatric EP BlogIan Law, MD
- EP Nursing BlogChristine Chiu-Man, MSC, FHRS, CCDS, CEPS
Vancouver, Washington
Plattsburg, New York
Chesterfield, Virginia
CME Showcase
![]() The Use of Remote Robotic Navigation in Complex Arrhythmias Complimentary Accredited Web Archive This activity is designed for electrophysiologists and EP allied professionals. Diagnosing Coronary Artery Disease: Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Solutions |
![]() LUMEN 2010 - THE SYMPOSIUM ON OPTIMAL TREATMENTS FOR ACUTE MI Live Symposium Date: February 25-27 Location: Loews Miami Beach Hotel Miami Beach, Florida 33139 |
REVIEW OUR OTHER
CARDIOLOGY BRANDS
Check out our other resources for healthcare professionals of all specialties.
Heart Rhythm



















Posted by Anonymous on October 14, 2009 at 12:10 pm
Our Universal Protocol states that diagnostic/interventional catheter insertion sites (groins,IJ,SC) do not need to be marked prior to percutaneous procedures. The protocol states that the number and size of sheaths/catheters inserted, and their placement, varies from patient to patient and physician to physician. It is my understanding that this satisfies TJC requirements.
For device procedures (implants, revisions, lead repos/additions, etc) we do mark the intended incision site. We use a sterile surgical marker (not a regular "magic marker"). The mark frequently washes off during the surgical prep, but can be reapplied by qualified personnel using a new sterile marker (the hospital has trialed numerous markers and so far we have not found any that does not wash off). The site markinig is done by the implanting physician prior to the patient entering the procedure room and is to be visible after draping the patient for the procedure.
TJC guidelines further state that the site mark must be removed following the procedure (to avoid confusion if further interventions are needed), so that complicates the issue further("sharpie" markers do not wash off with the prep, but are also difficult to remove after the procedure).
Interestingly, a recent study showed that the only marker that did not encourage bacterial growth was "sharpie" markers. However, experts fear that permanent markers could "tattoo" the skin, especially in infants/young children or the elderly.
Posted by Anonymous on July 29, 2009 at 4:07 pm
Our labs have not "weighed" in on marking the site for percutanous procedures. We perform the "time out" procedure and of course the site is one of the mandated items that needs to be addressed. With so much concern over implant infections, magic marker over the incision site could be a risk factor. I have not seen any data supporting this though. You have to be careful using a pair of clippers not to cut or damage the skin so scubbing off marker on patients with very friable skin could damage the skin.
As an aside, any suggestions on the RCES? I am interested in taking it and could appreciate any input.
dana.stjohn@leememorial.org
Post new comment