Differentiating Between Nursing Scope of Practice and Standards of Care

Scope of practice refers to the professional activities defined under state law. The scope of practice for nurses is determined by each state’s nurse practice act.

Standard of care, on the other hand, refers to the provision of services in a manner consistent with care, as another professional with similar training and experience faced with a similar care situation would provide. Standards of care set minimum criteria for job proficiency. They define unequivocally what quality of care is and provide specific criteria that can be used to determine if quality of care has been provided. A divergence from standards of care may result in professional negligence.[1]

In the American Nurses’ Association (ANA) document, “Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice”, scope of practice is defined by the “who,” “what,” “where,” “when,” “why,” and “how” of nursing practice, including advanced practice nursing. In 2008, the American College of Cardiology and the ANA developed the Scope and Standards of Practice for Cardiovascular (CV) Nursing. This document ensures that the highest level of CV quality care is promoted. These CV Nursing standards are important because they promote and direct professional nursing practice for self assessment, as well as outline what the CV nursing profession expects of CV nurses. These standards of care are guidelines and are not law unless referred to in state nurse practice acts. A divergence from standards of care may result in professional negligence.

Reference
1. Gura MT. Clinical considerations for the allied professional: Standards of professional practice for the allied professional in electrophysiology and pacing. Heart Rhythm 2004;1:250-251.

Melanie Gura, RN, MSN, CNS, FHRS, FAHA is the Director of Pacemaker & Arrhythmia Services at Northeast Ohio Cardiovascular Specialists in Akron, Ohio.

image description image description
Opinions expressed by authors, contributors, and advertisers are their own and not necessarily those of HMP Communications, the editorial staff, or any member of the editorial advisory board. HMP Communications is not responsible for accuracy of dosages given in articles printed herein. The appearance of advertisements in this journal is not a warranty, endorsement or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. HMP Communications disclaims responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas or products referred to in the articles or advertisements.


MedMalsays: October 15.2010 at 12:00 pm

Great post Melanie. Nurses need to always be mindful of what they are being asked to do and feel comfortable going "up the ladder" to superiors if they have any question about care being rendered.

Reply to this comment »
Anonymoussays: November 8.2010 at 14:51 pm

Thank you for your article. Could you please elaborate on the standards of care as pertains to the EP lab? Is there a national 'standard of care' for EP procedures? Are there national staffing standards of care regarding how many staff are required per case (and if state mandates RT's for each case, how does one staff accordingly)?
If an institution develops its own standard of care regarding EP cases, what mechanisms are in place if physicians attempt to breach those standards of care?
Cindy Levine, Phoenix, AZ

Reply to this comment »
Anonymoussays: November 9.2010 at 09:33 am

Do you see a GAP between standards of care and the current nursing scope in EP?

Reply to this comment »

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

8 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.