Pacemaker and Defibrillator Excimer Laser Assisted Lead Extraction at the University of Toledo Health Sciences Center
- Mon, 2/8/10 - 1:20pm
- 0 Comments
- 4482 reads
In this article, the authors provide an updated overview on successful lead extraction methods for pacemaker and defibrillator cases.
Permanent pacemakers and automatic internal cardioverter defibrillators (AICDs) have been improving and saving lives for over 50 years.1 Unfortunately, in rare cases these devices can pose potential harm to a patient, thus indicating removal. Removal or replacement of the generator only does not pose as much risk as lead extraction. Abandoning or disabling malfunctioning leads will suffice in the majority of patients who no longer have an indication or desire for continued therapy. However, lead extraction is indicated when malfunction results in potential harm, when there is difficulty clearing a blood stream infection, when venous stenosis has ensued, or when procedures, normally contraindicated with implanted devices, are necessary.2
The risk of lead extraction increases with duration of implant. After a few weeks, endothelialization causes lead adherence to the endocardium, vessel walls, and other leads. The thinner pacemaker leads and bulkier defibrillator leads should be referred to a specialized extraction center after 1 and 2 years post implant, respectively. In the past, open-heart surgical extraction or direct traction was required to remove these leads, both of which carry significant risk to the patient. Locking stylets and telescoping sheaths have also been used with success. Other factors associated with the difficulty of extraction include the type of insulation, structural integrity, associated thrombus or vegetation, and position or number of these leads.
At the University of Toledo Medical Center, we typically use an excimer laser sheath to assist with extraction of these endothelialized leads. The excimer laser is a rigid sheath that slides over the lead, disrupting a cylinder of fibrous tissue located extremely close to the lead’s insulation surface (Figures 1 and 2). This technique allows for safer stripping and shorter extraction time of the lead encompassed by endothelialization.3,4 Upsizing the sheath can also extract thrombus surrounding the lead, which may prevent thromboembolism downstream from the lead. An endovascular approach, with emergency surgical back-up, will usually present less risk to the patient for thrombi less than 3 centimeters.5 The experience of the operator and center typically plays a major role in success. The general consensus suggests at least 30 lead extractions performed per year to maintain proficiency.6
1. Lagergren H. How it happened: My recollection of early pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1978;1:140-143.
2. Victor F, De Place C, Camus C, et al. Pacemaker lead infection: Echocardiographic features, management, and outcome. Heart 1999;81:82-87.
3. Byrd CL, Wilkoff BL, Love CJ, et al. Clinical study of the laser sheath for lead extraction: The total experience in the United States. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002;25:804-808.
4. Wilkoff BL, Byrd CL, Love CJ, et al. Pacemaker lead extraction with the laser sheath: results of the pacing lead extraction with the excimer sheath (PLEXES) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1671-1676.
5. Ruttmann E, Hangler HB, Kilo J, et al. Transvenous pacemaker lead removal is safe and effective even in large vegetations: an analysis of 53 cases of pacemaker lead endocarditis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2006;29:231-236.
6. Wilkoff BL, Love CJ, Byrd CL, et al. Transvenous lead extraction: Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus on facilities, training, indications, and patient management: this document was endorsed by the American Heart Association (AHA). Heart Rhythm 2009;6:1085-1104.
7. Jones SO 4th, Eckart RE, Albert CM, Epstein LM. Large, single-center, single-operator experience with transvenous lead extraction: Outcomes and changing indications. Heart Rhythm 2008;5:520-525.












Post new comment