In the past, AF was considered just a nuisance. Patients were advised to learn how to live with it. Digoxin, and later beta blockers, were the drugs of choice to achieve rate control. We now know that AF is not just a nuisance. In fact, it is a serious problem with major and devastating complications.
Although AF is commonly known to be an affliction of growing old, there are almost 100,000 people in the US who are 40 years of age or younger suffering from this arrhythmia. In this group of patients, AF can have negative and debilitating effects on their quality of life.
People with AF have a 2-5% yearly chance of having a stroke than those who do not have AF. This percentage increases with age, to about 10% in those who are 65 or above. In the US, it is estimated that mortality caused by AF is approximately 10,000 per year, mainly from stroke.
In AF, since the atria quiver rather than contract, blood may pool, causing a thrombus to form and a stroke to happen. Anticoagulation has become a standard therapy for AF to minimize the risk of stroke. However, anticoagulation does not entirely eliminate that risk. It is believed that even when people do not suffer from stroke or TIA while in AF, micro-embolic events can occur causing subtle memory changes and dementia.

Classification of AF (Figure 2)

Each of the options presented in Figure 3 aims at reducing or eliminating the patient s symptoms and the risks associated with AF, mainly stroke and cardiomyopathy. The options adopted vary from one practice to the other, and treatment may include one or more of these options combined.
In this article, we will focus on the option of rhythm control with anti-arrhythmics (AA) mainly, the new generation of class 1C agents.

Class 1C AA (Figure 5)
The class 1C AA are a relatively new group of agents; they act by blocking the sodium channel (prolonging QRS), and have little effect on repolarization (no effect on QT interval). However, because of their negative inotropic effect, they are not recommended for patients with structural heart disease.
In the landmark study CAST (Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial), it was shown that patients with coronary artery disease and poor left ventricular function (EF < 40%) are at risk of developing proarrhythmia with class 1C antiarrhythmic agents.

Class 1C can be used safely and effectively in those patients without structural heart disease. In patients with hypertension, LVH should be documented to be less than 1.4 cm before a class 1C can be used.

In the US, almost 400,000 patients are hospitalized every year with the primary diagnosis of AF. It is estimated that half of these patients have lone AF, i.e. no ischemic heart disease or congestive heart failure. Those patients are considered good candidates for using class 1C AA. They are usually active and relatively young, and AF may greatly affect their quality of life.

Rythmol and Rythmol SR

In addition, the study showed that Rythmol SR did not appear to increase the recurrence of regular supraventricular tachycardia as atrial flutter (something which was widely reported when class 1C was initially introduced). Rythmol SR also did not appear to increase the occurrence of asymptomatic AF as evident by Holter monitoring.