Cooled Tip Catheter Ablation
- Sat, 5/3/08 - 12:34pm
- 0 Comments
- 4036 reads
ust over a decade ago, the advent of tip temperature monitoring during radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery marked the beginning of a second generation of ablation catheter technology and furthered the success of catheter ablation as a therapeutic tool. RF generators were designed with a closed-loop feedback system to automatically adjust power output to avoid temperatures that would cause coagulation formation on the ablation catheter tip.
Initially, it was recognized that as long as the tip was located at sites of good blood flow, the tip temperature rarely reached a level resulting in coagulum formation. On the other hand, if the tip was wedged in an area of inadequate blood flow, the system s impedance rapidly rose and power output would abruptly fall to the extent that the lesion was inadequate. This problem prompted interest in whether constant cooling of the ablation catheter tip might result in more effective lesion production and led to the development of the next generation of ablation catheter technology. This article will review the physiology of RF ablation, the use of cooled radiofrequency ablation, clinical trials, and current available systems.
Radiofrequency current is alternating electrical current at a range between 350-750 kHz between an electrode catheter tip resting on the endocardium and a grounding patch placed on the body surface. The grounding patch or plate, also known as a dispersive electrode, has a much greater surface area than the catheter tip. This dispersive effect minimizes any heat delivered to the skin as current flows through the patch. In contrast, the small surface area of the catheter tip is associated with very high current density which produces the desired effect of intensifying heat production in the area around the electrode.
Heating of the tissue around the catheter tip occurs in two phases (Figure 1). First, there is resistive heating, in which a mere millimeter of tissue beyond the catheter tip is heated. With resistive heating, an impedance change occurs between the metallic electrode (low impedance) and the tissue (high impedance). The region of tissue undergoing resistive heating becomes the source of radiant heat which results in tissue damage. It also gives rise to the second phase of heating, known as conductive heating, in which heat transfer to adjacent areas promotes tissue destruction. This conductive heat transfer is also sensed by a thermistor probe located inside the catheter tip and provides the basis for tip temperature monitoring. The resulting lesion size is determined by the balance of tissue conductive heat generation and convective heat loss carried away by tissue blood flow. Thus, lesion volume can be influenced by tissue blood flow within an area deep to the catheter tip.
References1. Wittkampf FW, Hauer RN, Robles de Medina ED. Radiofrequency ablation with cooled porous electrode (Abstr). J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;11:17A. 2. Skrumeda LL, Mehra R. Comparison of standard and irrigated radiofrequency ablation in the canine ventricle. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1998;9:1196–1205.3. Wharton JM, Nibley C, Sykes CM, et al. Establishment of a dose-response relationship for high-power chilled-tip radiofrequency current ablation in sheep (Abstr). J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:239A. 4. Peterson HH, Chen X, Pieterson A, et al. Temperature-controlled irrigated tip radiofrequency catheter ablation: Comparison of in vivo and in vitro lesion dimensions for standard catheter and irrigated tip catheter with minimal infusion rate. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1998;9:409–414.5. Nakagawa H, Willkampf FHM, Yamanashi WS, et al. Inverse relationship between electrode size and lesion size during radiofrequency ablation with active electrode cooling. Circulation 1998;98:458–465.6. Demazumder D, Mirotznik M, Schwartzman D. Comparison of irrigated electrode designs for radiofrequency ablation of myocardium. J Intervent Cardiac Electrophysiol 2001;5:391–400.7. Nakagawa H, Yamanashi W, Wittkampf F, et al. Comparison of tissue temperature and lesion size in radiofrequency ablation using saline irrigation with a small versus large tip electrode in a canine thigh muscle preparation. Circulation 1994;90;I-271.8. Demazumder D, Mirotznik M, Schwartzman D. Biophysics of radiofrequency ablation using an irrigated electrode. J Intervent Cardiac Electrophysiol 2001;5:377–389.9. Leveillee RJ, Hoey MF, Hulbert JC, et al. Enhanced radiofrequency ablation of canine prostate utilizing a liquid conductor: The virtual electrode. J Endourology 1996;10:5–11.10. Nabar A, Rodriguez LM, Timmermans C, Wellens HJ. Use of a saline-irrigated tip catheter for ablation of ventricular tachycardia resistant to conventional radiofrequency ablation: Early experience. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2001;12:153–161.11. Calkins H, Epstein A, Packer D, et al. Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease using cooled radiofrequency energy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:1905–1914.12. Jais P, Haissaguerre M, Shah DC, et al. Successful irrigated-tip catheter ablation of atrial flutter resistant to conventional radiofrequency ablation. Circulation 1998;98:835–838.13. Schreieck J, Zrenner B, Kumpmann J, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of closed cooled-tip versus 8-mm-tip catheters for radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2002;13:980–985.14. Garcia-Garcia J, Almendral J, Arenal A, et al. Irrigated tip catheter ablation in right posteroseptal accessory pathways resistant to conventional ablation. Pacing and Clin Electrophysiol 2002;25:799–803.15. Jain WK, Wolf PD, Henriquez C. Cooled-tip electrode radiofrequency ablation of the endocardium: A finite element study. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Montreal Canada, September 1995.16. Wharton JM, Wilber DJ, Calkins J, et al. Utility of tip thermometry during radiofrequency ablation in humans using an internally perfused saline cooled catheter (Abstr). Circulation 1997;96(Suppl 1):I-318.










Post new comment